REVIEW FORM



Reviewer's Name: (Please Print)



Affiliation: 

E-mail: 

EVALUATION GUIDELINES
Thank you for taking your time to do this review.

As you will see in the second part of this review, we would like to ask you to make explicit comments for each of the factors in this review form. These will be very important for the authors of accepted papers who will be able to follow them in the revised camera-ready version of their paper and, eventually, in the improved published version.



------------------------------- This part will be sent to the authors



Title : 

Authors : 





** Evaluation of work impact and contribution:

[ ] no discussion of related work (1)

[ ] limited discussion of related work (2), 

[ ] adequate discussion of related work (3), 

[ ] good discussion of related work (4) 

[ ] excellent discussion of related work (5) 



** Significance to theory and practice:

[ ] no significance (1)

[ ] little significance (2)

[ ] somewhat significant (3)

[ ] significant (4)

[ ] very significant (5)



** Originality and novelty:

[ ] no originality (1)

[ ] little originality (2)

[ ] somewhat original (3)

[ ] original (4)

[ ] highly original (5)



** Relevance to the call of papers:

[ ] not at all relevant (1)

[ ] limited relevance (2)

[ ] somewhat relevant (3)

[ ] relevant (4)

[ ] highly relevant (5)



** Readability and organization:

[ ] very poor (1)

[ ] somewhat weak (2)

[ ] neutral (3)

[ ] good (4)

[ ] excellent (5)



** Technical quality and soundness:

[ ] very poor (1)

[ ] somewhat weak (2)

[ ] neutral (3)

[ ] good (4)

[ ] excellent (5)



** Overall recommendation:

[ ] strong reject (1)

[ ] reject (2)

[ ] neutral (3)

[ ] accept (4)

[ ] strong accept (5) 



** Reviewer familiarity:

[ ] no confidence (1)

[ ] very little confidence (2)

[ ] some confidence (3)

[ ] confident (4)

[ ] very confident (5) 



** Comments to author(s) (structured as follows) :



- Originality

.....



- Significance

.....



- Technical Quality

.....



- Quality of Presentation

.....



- Other comments for the author(s):

...  





------------------------------- This part will be confidential



** Confidential comments to PC members:

.....



** Summary of review (to PC members):

.....



** If accepted, do you recommend this paper for post-proceedings?

[ ] Yes [ ] No



** Additionnal reviewers (please indicate the name and affiliation):