Computerised Minds. ...

A video sponsored by the society discusses Searle's Chinese Room Argument (CRA) and the heated debates surrounding it. In this video, which is accessible to the general public and those with interest in AI, Olly's Philosophy Tube ...


Erden in AI roundtab...

On Friday 4th September, philosopher and AISB member Dr Yasemin J Erden, participated in an AI roundtable at Second Home, hosted by Index Ventures and SwiftKey.   Joining her on the panel were colleagues from academia and indu...


AISB Convention 2016

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2016 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Bishop and AI news

Stephen Hawking thinks computers may surpass human intelligence and take over the world. This view is based on the ideology that all aspects of human mentality will eventually be realised by a program running on a suitable compu...


Connection Science

All individual members of The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour have a personal subscription to the Taylor Francis journal Connection Science as part of their membership. How to Acce...


Al-Rifaie on BBC

AISB Committee member and Research Fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, Dr Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie was interviewed by the BBC (in Farsi) along with his colleague Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid on the 6 November 2014. He was a...


AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: ( The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...



AISB event Bulletin Item

CFP: CLODEM 2010 - Comparing Logical Decision Methods

 CLODEM 2010                     
     Workshop on Comparing Logical Decision Methods      
               Edinburgh, July 15th, 2010                
      affiliated with LICS and IJCAR at FLoC'10         

Methods for deciding satisfiability of formulae are of vital
importance for both the theoretical relevance and practical
impact of a logic. Different logics require different decision
procedures. Nevertheless, certain methodologies like
terminating semantic tableaux, automata, games, SAT/SMT
methods, resolution, reductions, etc. have proved to be
successful in providing decidability results for several, even
quite different logics.
   Perception of some methodology being better than others has
grown within certain communities, for example regarding
automata-based techniques in automatic verification or
tableau-based techniques in knowledge representation. Such
perception, however, is often not based on systematic
comparative analysis. Sometimes, different methodologies
also turn out to do or even be the same in certain cases.
Yet, few formal technical results to that effect are known,
and the scientific discussions on the pros and cons, and
similarities and differences between different methodologies
have been rather sporadic so far.
   The purpose of this workshop is to provide an expert forum
for such discussion, to provoke and foster discussion between
communities, and to stimulate further research on that topic.
It is a generalization and follow-up of the AutoTab workshop
which was held with TABLEAUX'09 last year.
   The workshop welcomes contributions on comparisons between
different methods, exhibiting differences or similarities, in
theory or in practice, in general or with respect to a certain

Submissions should be in the form of extended abstracts of at
most 5 A4 pages in PDF format, preferably using Springer LNCS
style or a comparable format. Submissions may be based on new
and original, or on already published or submitted work, but
they should address the topic of the workshop.
   The abstracts of the workshop talks will be included in
informal proceedings. No formal proceedings are currently
planned, but if the workshop attracts sufficiently many
good and original contributions, a journal special issue
will be organized after the event.
   One author of each submission that is accepted for the
workshop must register for and attend the workshop in order
to present the paper.

Submissions deadline:                March 27, 2010
Notification deadline:               April 27, 2010
Finalized workshop programme:        April 30, 2010
Final versions of abstracts
for the informal proceedings:        May 31, 2010
Workshop:                            July 15, 2010


     * Stephane Demri,   CNRS Cachan,        F
     * Valentin Goranko, DTU Copenhagen,     DK
     * Rajeev Gore,      ANU Canberra,       AUS
     * Felix Klaedtke,   ETH Zurich,         CH
     * Daniel Krning,   Oxford University,  UK
     * Martin Lange,     LMU Munich,         D
     * Christof Lding,  RWTH Aachen,        D
     * Carsten Lutz,     Univ. of Bremen,    D
     * Renate Schmidt,   Univ. of Liverpool, UK
     * Colin Stirling,   Univ. of Edinburgh, UK

- Workshop website:
- FLoC'10 website:
- LICS'10 website:
- IJCAR'10 website:

ENQUIRIES to the organizers:
- Valentin Goranko,
- Martin Lange,