AISB Convention 2015

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2015 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Yasemin Erden on BBC

AISB Committee member, and Philosophy Programme Director and Lecturer, Dr Yasemin J. Erden interviewed for the BBC on 29 October 2013. Speaking on the Today programme for BBC Radio 4, as well as the Business Report for BBC world N...


Mark Bishop on BBC ...

Mark Bishop, Chair of the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, appeared on Newsnight to discuss the ethics of ‘killer robots’. He was approached to give his view on a report raising questions on the et...


AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: ( The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...


Lighthill Debates

The Lighthill debates from 1973 are now available on YouTube. You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video  



AISB event Bulletin Item

WORKSHOP: "Higher-order logic versus set theory", 29-30 March 2011, London


Higher-order logic versus set theory -------------------------------------- 29-30 March 2011 in London, Institute of Philosophy, Stewart House, Room ST274/275

From a mathematical point of view, higher-order logic (HOL) and set theory have a lot in common; for instance, both allow us to talk about collections of individuals, and there are partial translations in both directions.
However, philosophers often argue that HOL and set theory differ in important ways, such as epistemic status and ontological commitments. This workshop aims to assess the relation between HOL and set theory, drawing in part on an examination of the history of these theories.

Questions include the following.
- In the early twentieth century, HOL competed with set theory as the best foundation for mathematics and lost. What were the reasons for preferring set theory? Do these reasons remain valid today?
- Are higher-order logic and iterative set theory two ways of developing what are essentially the same ideas (as for instance G del argues)?
- How should the important notion of ontological commitment be understood?
Do HOLs carry ontological commitment?
- Can and should HOL be extended to logics of infinite order? If so, how should this be done?
- How closely do logics of infinite order resemble set theory? Does this teach us anything about the relation between HOL and set theory?

Jose Ferreiros (Sevilla)
Salvatore Florio (Birkbeck, University of London) Daniel Isaacson (Oxford) Ignasi Jane (Barcelona) Michael Potter (Cambridge) Stewart Shapiro (Ohio State University) Sean Walsh (Birkbeck, University of London)

We aim to begin around noon on the first day and to end by 6pm on the second.

The workshop is organized in connection with the European Research Council project "Plurals, predicates, and paradox"

To register, please email