AISB Convention 2015

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2015 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Read More...

Yasemin Erden on BBC

AISB Committee member, and Philosophy Programme Director and Lecturer, Dr Yasemin J. Erden interviewed for the BBC on 29 October 2013. Speaking on the Today programme for BBC Radio 4, as well as the Business Report for BBC world N...


Read More...

Mark Bishop on BBC ...

Mark Bishop, Chair of the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, appeared on Newsnight to discuss the ethics of ‘killer robots’. He was approached to give his view on a report raising questions on the et...


Read More...

AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/AISBTube (http://www.youtube.com/user/AISBTube). The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...


Read More...

Lighthill Debates

The Lighthill debates from 1973 are now available on YouTube. You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video  


Read More...
01234

Notice

AISB event Bulletin Item

CALL FOR PAPERS: Foundations of Logical Consequence, 8-10 June 2012, St. Andrews, SCOTLAND


First Call for Papers

Second Conference on the Foundations of Logical Consequence

*Time:* 8 June, 2012 - 10 June, 2012

*Location:* The Gateway, St Andrews

*Invited speakers:*

Michael Glanzberg (Northwestern)

Lloyd Humberstone (Monash)

Carrie Ichikawa Jenkins (British Columbia)

Joke Meheus (Ghent)

Francesco Paoli (Cagliari)

Douglas Patterson (Kansas)

Peter Schroeder-Heister (Tbingen)

Neil Tennant (Ohio State)

Gabriel Uzquiano (Oxford)



*Theme:***

The Conference will be the last event organised during the AHRC-funded Foundations of Logical 
Consequence project, and so will aim to bring together all the themes considered during the project.
The overall goal has been to clarify the foundations of logical consequence. Are these absolute or 
relative, or pluralist? Are the 'laws of thought' universal, topic-invariant, and certain, or are 
they relative to context, or are there different admissible senses of validity? Is pluralism a form 
of relativism? Should the foundations be essentially model-theoretic, or proof-theoretic, or some 
hybrid of the two, or is there a third way, e.g., deflationary? Is there a clear conception of a 
logical constant, such that all consequence is formal, or are there different logics for different 
concepts, modal, temporal, epistemic and so on? Further issues concern the relata of the 
consequence relation: are they sentences, propositions, utterances, statements or states of 
affairs? are they sets of such relata, or multi-sets, or sequences? are they finite or can they be 
infinite? Moreover, what of the epistemology of inference? How do the competing accounts of logical
consequence, and of the meanings of the logical constants, respectively, connect with the 
justification of logical principles? The aim is to bring together researchers in these fields to 
share their findings, reach conclusions, and provide a stimulus to further research.

*Submission:***

We invite submissions for presentations of 30 minutes? duration with 10 minutes for questions and 
discussion. Please submit an abstract for the presentation of between 1000 and 2000 words. Please 
provide contact details (name, address, affiliation, phone and email) separately from the abstract.
Submissions should be sent by email to FLC2Conference@gmail.com. Abstracts will be accepted in 
either pdf or MS word form. Abstracts will be blind refereed.

*Deadline for submission: *29 February 2012

*Communication of acceptance: *31 March 2012

* *

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of 
Scotland and from the Scots Philosophical Association.