Computerised Minds. ...

A video sponsored by the society discusses Searle's Chinese Room Argument (CRA) and the heated debates surrounding it. In this video, which is accessible to the general public and those with interest in AI, Olly's Philosophy Tube ...


Erden in AI roundtab...

On Friday 4th September, philosopher and AISB member Dr Yasemin J Erden, participated in an AI roundtable at Second Home, hosted by Index Ventures and SwiftKey.   Joining her on the panel were colleagues from academia and indu...


AISB Convention 2016

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2016 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Bishop and AI news

Stephen Hawking thinks computers may surpass human intelligence and take over the world. This view is based on the ideology that all aspects of human mentality will eventually be realised by a program running on a suitable compu...


Connection Science

All individual members of The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour have a personal subscription to the Taylor Francis journal Connection Science as part of their membership. How to Acce...


Al-Rifaie on BBC

AISB Committee member and Research Fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, Dr Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie was interviewed by the BBC (in Farsi) along with his colleague Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid on the 6 November 2014. He was a...


AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: ( The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...



AISB event Bulletin Item

CALL FOR PARTICIPATION: The Historical Turn in Philosophy of Science: Kuhn, Feyerabend, Wittgenstein, 10-11 May 2013, Zuerich, SWITZERLAND

The Institute of Philosophy of the University of Zurich is pleased to
announce a masterclass:

The Historical Turn in Philosophy of Science: Kuhn, Feyerabend, Wittgenstein


Vasso Kindi (University of Athens) and John Preston (University of Reading)

10th - 11th May 2013, 9:30 - 19:00

The historical turn in philosophy of science which began in the late
1950s and early 60s rattled the way that philosophy of science was
hitherto practiced. New concepts, such as paradigm, incommensurability,
and theory-ladenness were introduced, and new problems were raised, such
as the rationality of scientific development, the integrity of
scientific practice, relativism and idealism in relation to science. The
effects were very disconcerting and quickly historical philosophy of
science was vehemently criticized and eventually marginalized as not
meeting the standards and expectations which this turn attempted to
question, for instance, an algorithmic and ahistorical understanding of
rationality, or the belief in unremitting scientific progress. The
reception that historical philosophy of science received obstructed the
full appreciation of several important aspects concerning its roots,
contentions and implications. Thus Wittgenstein was not on the agenda of
mainstream philosophy of science when historical philosophy was
discussed and his influence on the protagonists of this movement passed
largely unnoticed; the challenge that Kuhn and Feyerabend mounted to
Western rationalism was swiftly condemned rather than attended to; and
the concepts of paradigm and incommensurability were demonized rather
than carefully interpreted and judged.
In the seminar, we will put aside facile and worn-out categorizations
and assimilations. Instead, we will revisit the work of key figures of
historical philosophy of science, principally the work of Kuhn and
Feyerabend, to explore the dimensions and implications which were not
emphasized and generally recognized in the previous period. For
instance, instead of simply dismissing rationality, the emphasis on
practice shifts interest from an intellectualist understanding of
rationality to the concrete practical decisions scientists have to make;
and the historical dimension made prominent by historical philosophers
of science calls attention to the intricate relations between philosophy
and science in different historical periods and hence to the influence
exercised by scientists on philosophers, e.g., by Boltzmann on
Feyerabend and Wittgenstein. On this basis we hope to reach a more
judicious assessment of the historical turn, its achievements and its shortcomings.

Bibliography available on request.

Venue: Philosophisches Seminar, Zrichbergstrasse 43, 8044 Zrich, Room: ZUP-U-8