Al-Rifaie on BBC

AISB Committee member and Research Fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, Dr Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie was interviewed by the BBC (in Farsi) along with his colleague Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid on the 6 November 2014. He was a...


Rose wins the Loebne...

After 2 hours of judging at Bletchley Park, 'Rose' by Bruce Wilcox was declared the winner of the Loebner Prize 2014, held in conjunction with the AISB.  The event was well attended, film live by Sky News and the special guest jud...


AISB Convention 2015

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2015 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Yasemin Erden on BBC

AISB Committee member, and Philosophy Programme Director and Lecturer, Dr Yasemin J. Erden interviewed for the BBC on 29 October 2013. Speaking on the Today programme for BBC Radio 4, as well as the Business Report for BBC world N...


Mark Bishop on BBC ...

Mark Bishop, Chair of the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, appeared on Newsnight to discuss the ethics of ‘killer robots’. He was approached to give his view on a report raising questions on the et...


AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: ( The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...



AISB event Bulletin Item

CALL FOR PARTICIPATION: Thought Experiments, Counterfactuals and Modal Knowledge, 2-3 Sep 2013, Berlin, GERMANY

In philosophy, claims of knowledge are often based on considering non-actual scenarios. But 
it is not so clear what explains and justifies such practices. Opposing the 
traditional view that the knowledge at stake is conceptual or based on 
rational intuitions, Timothy Williamson has come up with a revolutionary proposal: both modal 
claims and thought experiments can be accounted for in terms of our capacity for evaluating 
everyday counterfactuals. No wonder this innovative proposal sparked intense debate. 

To mention just two critical points: First, one might wonder whether our 
ability to evaluate the relevant counterfactuals depends upon prior 
knowledge of metaphysical necessity or essentiality. If so, the account runs the 
risk of being circular. Second, Williamson?s account of thought experiments is designed 
to address the problem that any case description could be realised in a deviant way. 
One might suspect that Williamson?s own counterfactual account falls prey to the same 
difficulty. The workshop aims at promoting the critical discussion of the counterfactual 
account of both modal knowledge and thought experiments.

Speakers:                       Juhani Yli-Vakkuri (Oslo)
                                         Timothy Williamson (Oxford)
                                         Tobias Rosefeldt
  Romero (Constance)
                                         Christian Nimtz (Bielefeld)
                                         Jonathan Ichikawa (Vancouver)
                                         Joachim Horvath
                                         Daniel Dohrn (Berlin)


If you would like to participate, please contact Daniel Dohrn: