Al-Rifaie on BBC

AISB Committee member and Research Fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, Dr Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie was interviewed by the BBC (in Farsi) along with his colleague Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid on the 6 November 2014. He was a...


Read More...

Rose wins the Loebne...

After 2 hours of judging at Bletchley Park, 'Rose' by Bruce Wilcox was declared the winner of the Loebner Prize 2014, held in conjunction with the AISB.  The event was well attended, film live by Sky News and the special guest jud...


Read More...

AISB Convention 2015

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2015 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Read More...

Yasemin Erden on BBC

AISB Committee member, and Philosophy Programme Director and Lecturer, Dr Yasemin J. Erden interviewed for the BBC on 29 October 2013. Speaking on the Today programme for BBC Radio 4, as well as the Business Report for BBC world N...


Read More...

Mark Bishop on BBC ...

Mark Bishop, Chair of the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, appeared on Newsnight to discuss the ethics of ‘killer robots’. He was approached to give his view on a report raising questions on the et...


Read More...

AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/AISBTube (http://www.youtube.com/user/AISBTube). The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...


Read More...
012345

Notice

AISB event Bulletin Item

FINAL CALL FOR PAPERS: The 7th AISB Symposium on Computing and Philosophy: Is computation observer-relative?, AISB-50, 1-4 April 2014, Goldsmiths, London, UK-EXTENDED DEADLINE

http://extranet.smuc.ac.uk/events-conferences/aisb-symposium-2014/Pages/default.aspx


OVERVIEW:

 One of the claims integral to John Searles critique of computational cognitive science and 
Strong AI was that computation is observer-relative or observer-dependent (Searle, The 
Rediscovery of the Mind, 1992). This claim has already proven to be very controversial in 
cognitive science and AI (Endicott 1996; Coulter & Sharrock, Rey, and Haugeland in Preston & 
Bishop (eds.), Views into the Chinese Room, 2002).

 Those who come to the subject of computation via physics, for example, often argue that 
computational properties are physical properties, that is, that computation is intrinsic to 
physics. On such views, computation is comparable to the flow of information, where information 
is conceived of in statistical terms, and thus computation is both observer-independent and (perhaps) 
ubiquitous. Connected with this are related issues about causality and identity (including 
continuity of), as well as the question of alternative formulations of information.

 This symposium seeks to evaluate arguments, such as (but not limited to) Searles, which 
bear directly on the question of what kind of processes and properties computational processes 
and properties are. It thus seeks to address the general question What is computation? in a 
somewhat indirect way. Questions that might be tackled include: Are computational properties 
syntactic properties? Are syntactic properties discovered, or assigned? If they must be assigned, 
as Searle argues, does this mean they are or can be assigned arbitrarily? Might computational 
properties be universally realized? Would such universal realizability be objectionable, or 
trivialise computationalism? Is syntax observer-relative? What kinds of properties (if any) are 
observer-relative or observer-dependent? Is observer-relativity a matter of degree? Might the 
question of whether computation is observer-relative have different answers depending on what is 
carrying out the computation in question? Might the answer to this question be affected by the 
advent of new computing technologies, such as biologically- and physically-inspired models of 
computation? Is it time to start distinguishing between different meanings of computation, or 
is there still mileage in the idea that some single notion of computation is both thin enough to 
cover all the kinds of activities we call computational, and yet still informative (non-trivial)? 
Does Searles idea that syntax is observer-relative serve to support, or instead to undermine, his 
famous Chinese Room argument?

TOPICS OF INTEREST:

 1.              COMPUTATIONAL-PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES

 Questions of ontology and epistemology
 
i.  COMPUTATION AS OBSERVER RELATIVE
 
Is computation an observer relative phenomenon? What implications do answers to this question have 
for the doctrine of computationalism?
 
ii.  WHAT IS COMPUTATION?
 
Does computation (the unfolding process of a computational system) define a natural kind? If so, 
how do we differentiate the computational from the non-computational?
 

iii. IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPUTATIONAL ONTOLOGY, and PAN-COMPUTATIONALISM  


To what extent and in what ways can we say that computation is taking place in natural systems? 
Are the laws of natural processes computational? Does a rock implement every input-less FSA 
(Putnam, Chalmers)? Is the evolution of the universe computable as the output of an algorithm? 
I.e. is the temporal evolution of a state of the universe a digital informational process akin 
to what goes on in the circuitry of a computer? Digital ontology' (Zuse), "the nature of the 
physical universe is ultimately discrete"; cf. Kant's distinction - from the antinomies of pure 
reason - of "simple parts" and no simple parts; the discrete and the analogue.
 

2.              SOME COMPUTATIONAL-PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES

 Computation in machines and computation in nature; Turing versus non-Turing computation


 
i.  COMPUTATION IN NATURE
 
Investigating the difference between formal models of physical and biological systems and physical/
biological reality-in-itself and the implication(s) for theory of mind / cognition.
 
(a)  The study of 'computation' using natural processes / entities (i.e. machines not exclusively 
based on [man-made] silicon-based architectures).
 (b)  What is the underlying nature of such natural [physical/biological] computational processes? 
I.e. are the laws of natural processes computational at their very core OR merely contingently 
computational because the mathematical language we use to express them is biased towards being 
computational?
 

SUBMISSION AND PUBLICATION DETAILS:

 Submissions must be full papers and should be sent via EasyChair:
https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=aisb14cp

 Text editor templates from a previous convention can be found at: 


 We request that submitted papers are limited to eight pages. Each paper will receive at least 
two reviews. Selected papers will be published in the general proceedings of the AISB Convention, 
with the proviso that at least ONE author attends the symposium in order to present the paper and 
participate in general symposium activities.

IMPORTANT DATES:


 
      i. Full paper submission deadline: 13 January 2014   - EXTENDED DEADLINE
 
      ii. Notification of acceptance/rejection decisions: 3 February 2014
 
      iii. Final versions of accepted papers (Camera ready copy): 24 February 2014
 
 
 
      iv. Convention: 1st - 4th April 2014, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK [symposium date 1 April]
 
 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

 There will be separate proceedings for each symposium, produced before the Congress, and 
available to conference delegates. In previous years there have been awards for the best student 
paper, and limited student bursaries. These details will be circulated as and when they become 
available. Authors of a selection of the best papers will be invited to submit an extended version 
of the work to a journal special issue.

SYMPOSIUM ORGANISERS:


 
Symposium Chair: Dr. John Preston, Department of Philosophy, The University of Reading, Reading, UK.
 

                  email: j.m.preston@reading.ac.uk
 
                  tel. +44 (0) 118 378 7327
 
                  web page: 

Symposium Executive-Officer and OC member: Dr. Yasemin J. Erden, CBET, St Mary's University College, Twickenham, UK.

email: yj.erden@smuc.ac.uk
 
tel: +44 (0) 208 224 4250
 

web page: 
 

Symposium OC Member: Prof. Mark Bishop, Department of Computing, Goldsmiths, University of London, 
London, UK.
 
email: m.bishop@gold.ac.uk
 
tel: +44 (0) 207 078 5048
 
web page: 
 

Symposium OC member: Prof. Slawomir J Nasuto, School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading,
Reading, UK.
 
email: s.j.nasuto@reading.ac.uk
 
tel: +44 (0) 118 378 6701
 
web page: 
 

SYMPOSIUM WEBSITE: http://extranet.smuc.ac.uk/events-conferences/aisb-symposium-2014/Pages/default.aspx

POSTER ADVERTISING THE CFP: http://extranet.smuc.ac.uk/events-conferences/aisb-symposium-2014/Documents/AISB-Symposium-2014-Poster.pdf

PROGRAMME COMMITTEE:

Dr Mark Coeckelbergh (University of Twente, NL)

 Prof. S. Barry Cooper (University of Leeds, UK)

 Dr. Anthony Galton (University of Exeter, UK)

 Dr Bob Kentridge (Durham University, UK) 

Dr Stephen Rainey (St Mary's University College, UK)

 Dr Mark Sprevak (University of Edinburgh, UK)

 Prof. Michael Wheeler (University of Stirling, UK)