Harold Cohen

Harold Cohen, tireless computer art pioneer dies at 87   Harold Cohen at the Tate (1983) Aaron image in background   Harold Cohen died at 87 in his studio on 27th April 2016 in Encintias California, USA.The first time I hear...


Dancing with Pixies?...

At TEDx Tottenham, London Mark Bishop (the former chair of the Society) demonstrates that if the ongoing EU flagship science project - the 1.6 billion dollar "Human Brain Project” - ultimately succeeds in understanding all as...


Computerised Minds. ...

A video sponsored by the society discusses Searle's Chinese Room Argument (CRA) and the heated debates surrounding it. In this video, which is accessible to the general public and those with interest in AI, Olly's Philosophy Tube ...


Erden in AI roundtab...

On Friday 4th September, philosopher and AISB member Dr Yasemin J Erden, participated in an AI roundtable at Second Home, hosted by Index Ventures and SwiftKey.   Joining her on the panel were colleagues from academia and indu...


AISB Convention 2016

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2016 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Bishop and AI news

Stephen Hawking thinks computers may surpass human intelligence and take over the world. This view is based on the ideology that all aspects of human mentality will eventually be realised by a program running on a suitable compu...


Connection Science

All individual members of The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour have a personal subscription to the Taylor Francis journal Connection Science as part of their membership. How to Acce...


Al-Rifaie on BBC

AISB Committee member and Research Fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, Dr Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie was interviewed by the BBC (in Farsi) along with his colleague Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid on the 6 November 2014. He was a...


AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/AISBTube (http://www.youtube.com/user/AISBTube). The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...



AISB event Bulletin Item

FINAL CALL FOR PAPERS: The 7th AISB Symposium on Computing and Philosophy: Is computation observer-relative?, AISB-50, 1-4 April 2014, Goldsmiths, London, UK-EXTENDED DEADLINE



 One of the claims integral to John Searles critique of computational cognitive science and 
Strong AI was that computation is observer-relative or observer-dependent (Searle, The 
Rediscovery of the Mind, 1992). This claim has already proven to be very controversial in 
cognitive science and AI (Endicott 1996; Coulter & Sharrock, Rey, and Haugeland in Preston & 
Bishop (eds.), Views into the Chinese Room, 2002).

 Those who come to the subject of computation via physics, for example, often argue that 
computational properties are physical properties, that is, that computation is intrinsic to 
physics. On such views, computation is comparable to the flow of information, where information 
is conceived of in statistical terms, and thus computation is both observer-independent and (perhaps) 
ubiquitous. Connected with this are related issues about causality and identity (including 
continuity of), as well as the question of alternative formulations of information.

 This symposium seeks to evaluate arguments, such as (but not limited to) Searles, which 
bear directly on the question of what kind of processes and properties computational processes 
and properties are. It thus seeks to address the general question What is computation? in a 
somewhat indirect way. Questions that might be tackled include: Are computational properties 
syntactic properties? Are syntactic properties discovered, or assigned? If they must be assigned, 
as Searle argues, does this mean they are or can be assigned arbitrarily? Might computational 
properties be universally realized? Would such universal realizability be objectionable, or 
trivialise computationalism? Is syntax observer-relative? What kinds of properties (if any) are 
observer-relative or observer-dependent? Is observer-relativity a matter of degree? Might the 
question of whether computation is observer-relative have different answers depending on what is 
carrying out the computation in question? Might the answer to this question be affected by the 
advent of new computing technologies, such as biologically- and physically-inspired models of 
computation? Is it time to start distinguishing between different meanings of computation, or 
is there still mileage in the idea that some single notion of computation is both thin enough to 
cover all the kinds of activities we call computational, and yet still informative (non-trivial)? 
Does Searles idea that syntax is observer-relative serve to support, or instead to undermine, his 
famous Chinese Room argument?



 Questions of ontology and epistemology
Is computation an observer relative phenomenon? What implications do answers to this question have 
for the doctrine of computationalism?
Does computation (the unfolding process of a computational system) define a natural kind? If so, 
how do we differentiate the computational from the non-computational?


To what extent and in what ways can we say that computation is taking place in natural systems? 
Are the laws of natural processes computational? Does a rock implement every input-less FSA 
(Putnam, Chalmers)? Is the evolution of the universe computable as the output of an algorithm? 
I.e. is the temporal evolution of a state of the universe a digital informational process akin 
to what goes on in the circuitry of a computer? Digital ontology' (Zuse), "the nature of the 
physical universe is ultimately discrete"; cf. Kant's distinction - from the antinomies of pure 
reason - of "simple parts" and no simple parts; the discrete and the analogue.


 Computation in machines and computation in nature; Turing versus non-Turing computation

Investigating the difference between formal models of physical and biological systems and physical/
biological reality-in-itself and the implication(s) for theory of mind / cognition.
(a)  The study of 'computation' using natural processes / entities (i.e. machines not exclusively 
based on [man-made] silicon-based architectures).
 (b)  What is the underlying nature of such natural [physical/biological] computational processes? 
I.e. are the laws of natural processes computational at their very core OR merely contingently 
computational because the mathematical language we use to express them is biased towards being 


 Submissions must be full papers and should be sent via EasyChair:

 Text editor templates from a previous convention can be found at: 

 We request that submitted papers are limited to eight pages. Each paper will receive at least 
two reviews. Selected papers will be published in the general proceedings of the AISB Convention, 
with the proviso that at least ONE author attends the symposium in order to present the paper and 
participate in general symposium activities.


      i. Full paper submission deadline: 13 January 2014   - EXTENDED DEADLINE
      ii. Notification of acceptance/rejection decisions: 3 February 2014
      iii. Final versions of accepted papers (Camera ready copy): 24 February 2014
      iv. Convention: 1st - 4th April 2014, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK [symposium date 1 April]

 There will be separate proceedings for each symposium, produced before the Congress, and 
available to conference delegates. In previous years there have been awards for the best student 
paper, and limited student bursaries. These details will be circulated as and when they become 
available. Authors of a selection of the best papers will be invited to submit an extended version 
of the work to a journal special issue.


Symposium Chair: Dr. John Preston, Department of Philosophy, The University of Reading, Reading, UK.

                  email: j.m.preston@reading.ac.uk
                  tel. +44 (0) 118 378 7327
                  web page: 

Symposium Executive-Officer and OC member: Dr. Yasemin J. Erden, CBET, St Mary's University College, Twickenham, UK.

email: yj.erden@smuc.ac.uk
tel: +44 (0) 208 224 4250

web page: 

Symposium OC Member: Prof. Mark Bishop, Department of Computing, Goldsmiths, University of London, 
London, UK.
email: m.bishop@gold.ac.uk
tel: +44 (0) 207 078 5048
web page: 

Symposium OC member: Prof. Slawomir J Nasuto, School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading,
Reading, UK.
email: s.j.nasuto@reading.ac.uk
tel: +44 (0) 118 378 6701
web page: 

SYMPOSIUM WEBSITE: http://extranet.smuc.ac.uk/events-conferences/aisb-symposium-2014/Pages/default.aspx

POSTER ADVERTISING THE CFP: http://extranet.smuc.ac.uk/events-conferences/aisb-symposium-2014/Documents/AISB-Symposium-2014-Poster.pdf


Dr Mark Coeckelbergh (University of Twente, NL)

 Prof. S. Barry Cooper (University of Leeds, UK)

 Dr. Anthony Galton (University of Exeter, UK)

 Dr Bob Kentridge (Durham University, UK) 

Dr Stephen Rainey (St Mary's University College, UK)

 Dr Mark Sprevak (University of Edinburgh, UK)

 Prof. Michael Wheeler (University of Stirling, UK)