Bishop and AI news

Stephen Hawking thinks computers may surpass human intelligence and take over the world. This view is based on the ideology that all aspects of human mentality will eventually be realised by a program running on a suitable compu...


Connection Science

All individual members of The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour have a personal subscription to the Taylor Francis journal Connection Science as part of their membership. How to Acce...


Al-Rifaie on BBC

AISB Committee member and Research Fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, Dr Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie was interviewed by the BBC (in Farsi) along with his colleague Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid on the 6 November 2014. He was a...


Rose wins the Loebne...

After 2 hours of judging at Bletchley Park, 'Rose' by Bruce Wilcox was declared the winner of the Loebner Prize 2014, held in conjunction with the AISB.  The event was well attended, film live by Sky News and the special guest jud...


AISB Convention 2015

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2015 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Yasemin Erden on BBC

AISB Committee member, and Philosophy Programme Director and Lecturer, Dr Yasemin J. Erden interviewed for the BBC on 29 October 2013. Speaking on the Today programme for BBC Radio 4, as well as the Business Report for BBC world N...


Mark Bishop on BBC ...

Mark Bishop, Chair of the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, appeared on Newsnight to discuss the ethics of ‘killer robots’. He was approached to give his view on a report raising questions on the et...


AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: ( The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...



AISB event Bulletin Item

CALL FOR PAPERS: Mathematising Science: Limits and Perspectives 2, 1-3 Jun 2014, Norwich (U.K.)

 This event follows from the 2013 MSLP (Mathematising Science: Limits and Perspectives) conference 
and is entirely devoted to mathematisation, understood in two interrelated ways: as the creation 
of new mathematical objects from originally intuitive objects or problems (e.g. knots, games, 
colourings) or as the mathematical treatment of empirical problems that emerge in science. We 
seek to examine mathematisation both from the ?internal? point of view of pure mathematics, and 
the ?external? point of view of mathematical applications.

 Jessica Carter (Southern Denmark)
 Hasok Chang (Cambridge)
 Roman Frigg (LSE)
 Elaine Landry (UC Davis)
 Richard Pettigrew (Bristol)
 Mark Wilson (Pittsburgh)

 1. Abstract Submission deadline: 1 March 2013
 2. Notification of decisions: 31 March 2013
 3. Conference dates: 1 - 3 June 2013


 Authors are invited to submit an abstract of 100 words and an extended 
abstract of 1000 words. Please prepare your abstracts for blind review and 
save your extended abstract as a PDF file. There are 8 slots for 
contributed papers, each of which will be allocated 30 minutes for 
presentation, followed by a 15 minute discussion. We support the Gendered 
Conference Campaign by applying its strategy to our conference: 
For submissions, go to: 
When logged in, click on the 'New Submission' tab. Include your 100 words 
abstract and upload the PDF file of your extended abstract. Please feel 
free to contact the organisers with any questions you may have at:

 Possible contributed topics include, but are not limited to, the 

- Does intuition provide only the initial material, soon to be discarded, 
for mathematical theorising, or does it assist it in its full development?

- Do mathematical proofs rely on intuitive support, e.g. diagrammatic or 
geometrical reasoning, in any significant way or does intuition intervene 
only at a preliminary, heuristic stage?

- Is there a specific sense in which the choice of a particular intuitive 
content (e.g. knots, networks) guides the articulation of a mathematical 
theory by selecting the concepts worth introducing, the theorems worth 
proving, the connections with other mathematical theories worth making? - 
Is it possible to decide whether a field of scientific inquiry is amenable 
to a certain mathematical treatment?

- Is it possible to determine uniform criteria for mathematisation?

- Is there a cost at forcibly fitting an empirical field of inquiry to the 
structure of a mathematical object (an especially pressing problem in 
mathematical social science)?

- Is mathematics just a tool of empirical enquiry or does it play a more 
substantial role, e.g. by generating explanations or yielding a unified 
picture of disparate phenomena?

- Is it possible to subject the same empirical settings to alternative, 
non-equivalent mathematical treatments?

 REGISTRATION FEE There is a 30 registration standard fee for non-student 
participants and a 10 fee for students.