Computerised Minds. ...

A video sponsored by the society discusses Searle's Chinese Room Argument (CRA) and the heated debates surrounding it. In this video, which is accessible to the general public and those with interest in AI, Olly's Philosophy Tube ...


Erden in AI roundtab...

On Friday 4th September, philosopher and AISB member Dr Yasemin J Erden, participated in an AI roundtable at Second Home, hosted by Index Ventures and SwiftKey.   Joining her on the panel were colleagues from academia and indu...


AISB Convention 2016

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2016 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Bishop and AI news

Stephen Hawking thinks computers may surpass human intelligence and take over the world. This view is based on the ideology that all aspects of human mentality will eventually be realised by a program running on a suitable compu...


Connection Science

All individual members of The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour have a personal subscription to the Taylor Francis journal Connection Science as part of their membership. How to Acce...


Al-Rifaie on BBC

AISB Committee member and Research Fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, Dr Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie was interviewed by the BBC (in Farsi) along with his colleague Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid on the 6 November 2014. He was a...


AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: ( The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...



AISB event Bulletin Item

CFP: TAP 2008 - Tests And Proof

 TAP 2008
	     Second International Conference on Tests and Proofs

		April 9-11, 2008, Prato (near Florence), Italy

			      *CALL FOR PAPERS*


The TAP conference is devoted to the convergence of proofs and tests.
It combines ideas from both sides for the advancement of software quality.

To prove the correctness of a program is to demonstrate, through impeccable
mathematical techniques, that it has no bugs; to test a program is to run it
with the expectation of discovering bugs. The two techniques seem
contradictory: if you have proved your program, it's fruitless to comb it for
bugs; and if you are testing it, that is surely a sign that you have given up
on any hope to prove its correctness.

Accordingly, proofs and tests have, since the onset of software engineering
research, been pursued by distinct communities using rather different
techniques and tools.

And yet the development of both approaches leads to the discovery of common
issues and to the realization that each may need the other. The emergence of
model checking has been one of the first signs that contradiction may yield to
complementarity, but in the past few years an increasing number of research
efforts have encountered the need for combining proofs and tests, dropping
earlier dogmatic views of incompatibility and taking instead the best of what
each of these software engineering domains has to offer.

      How does deduction help testing? How does testing help deduction?
 How can the combination of testing and deduction increase the reach of both?


Topics include:

  - Generation of test data, oracles, or preambles by deductive techniques
    such as theorem proving, model checking, symbolic execution,
    constraint logic programming, etc.
  - Generation of specifications by deduction
  - Verification techniques combining proofs and tests
  - Program proving with the aid of testing techniques
  - Transfer of concepts from testing to proving (e.g., coverage criteria)
  - Automatic bug finding
  - Formal frameworks
  - Tool descriptions and experience reports
  - Case studies


November 2, 2007:     Abstract submission deadline
November 9, 2008:     Paper submission deadline
January 20, 2008:     Acceptance notification
February 3, 2008:     Final version due
April 9-11, 2008:     Conference


Submissions should describe previously unpublished work (completed or in
progress), including descriptions of research, tools, and applications.
Papers must be formatted following the Springer LNCS guidelines and be at most
15 pages long.

Submission of papers is via EasyChair at

The proceedings are planned to be published within Springer's LNCS
series. They will be available at the conference.


B. Meyer  (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)


B. Beckert  (U of Koblenz, Germany)
R. Hhnle  (Chalmers U of Technology, Sweden)


B. Aichernig  (TU Graz, Austria)
M. Butler  (U of Southampton, UK)
P. Chalin (Concordia U Montreal, Canada)
T.Y. Chen  (Swinburne U of Technology, Australia)
Y. Gurevich  (Microsoft Research, USA)
D. Hamlet  (Portland State U, USA)
W. Howden  (U of California at San Diego, USA)
D. Jackson  (MIT, USA)
K. Meinke  (KTH Stockholm, Sweden)
B. Meyer  (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)
P. Mller  (Microsoft Research, USA)
T. Nipkow  (TU Mnchen, Germany)
A. Polini  (U of Camerino, Italy)
Robby (Kansas State U, USA)
D. Rosenblum  (U College London, UK)
W. Schulte  (Microsoft Research, USA)
N. Sharygina  (U of Lugano, Switzerland, and CMU, USA)
B. Venneri  (U of Firenze, Italy)
B. Wolff  (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)


Y. Gurevich  (Microsoft Research, USA)
B. Meyer  (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)


C. Gladisch  (U of Koblenz, Germany)
P. Rmmer  (Chalmers U of Technology, Sweden)