Yasemin Erden on BBC

AISB Committee member, and Philosophy Programme Director and Lecturer, Dr Yasemin J. Erden interviewed for the BBC on 29 October 2013. Speaking on the Today programme for BBC Radio 4, as well as the Business Report for BBC world N...


AISB Convention 2014

AISB-50: a convention commemorating both 50 years since the founding of the society for the study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (the AISB) and sixty years since the death of Alan Turing, founding fathe...


Mark Bishop on BBC ...

Mark Bishop, Chair of the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, appeared on Newsnight to discuss the ethics of ‘killer robots’. He was approached to give his view on a report raising questions on the et...


AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/AISBTube (http://www.youtube.com/user/AISBTube). The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...


Lighthill Debates

The Lighthill debates from 1973 are now available on YouTube. You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video  



AISB event Bulletin Item

CFP: HRI08 Workshop Robotic Helpers




A full-day workshop at ACM/IEEE Human-Robot Interaction Conference (HRI08)
URL: http://homepages.feis.herts.ac.uk/~comqkd/HRI08-WS-RoboticHelpers.html
12 March 2008, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Submission deadline for full papers or extended abstracts:
14 December 2007

Motivation and Background:

Rehabilitation robotics comprises assistive and therapy robotics whereby robots either compensate for functionalities that a person does not possess (e.g. a smart knee joint in prosthetic leg) or where robots play a role in the effort of trying to regain impaired functionalities (e.g. arm function training for stroke patients). Robotic therapy systems may not be able to provide
a cure or fully compensate for  impairments, but may be able to extend or enhance certain impaired functions in  order to increase quality of life, independent living, as well as support   needs for communication and social interaction (e.g. for elderly people or people with developmental delays). Finally it is hoped that robotic technology may add to the solution of the increasing problem of shortage in available personal care due to demographic changes. Increasing the quality of life of people, providing enjoyment in otherwise constrained conditions that are restricting expressions of personality, personal interests, and enjoyment, constitutes an area with a potentially large user group, including hospitalized people, and people who could simply benefit from a service robot that serves as a companion in the home that may do certain domestic and other tasks efficiently and in a manner that is comfortable and acceptable to people.

The boundaries between assistive robotics, therapy robotics and service robotics are fluid, with a necessary (but often not fully realized) focus on human beings, the users, who are crucial to the success or failure of research and commercial efforts put into the development of robotic systems. Users (primary as well as secondary, the  latter consisting of therapists, doctors, family members, parents, etc.)  are ideally involved from the very first phases of the planning and design  of a new robotic system, continuously through various stages of evaluation  and prototyping. This research domain is unique in HRI because of the high level of interaction customization and, ideally, personalization required to account for users' abilities and interests. For robotic helpers in assistive and therapy robotics, it is crucial that they are able to engage users long-term in interaction, providing an enjoyable, motivating experience. HRI research has shown that the novelty effect quickly wears off, which may be acceptable in entertainment applications with only short-term encounters, but for robotic helpers to be useful in  therapy and rehabilitation they need to be able to keep the interest of the users. The problem of keeping users engaged is complex, and we cannot expect an easy answer. At present, it is not clear what social, interactive and communicative skills are required for robotic

Clearly, these will depend on:
*  The nature of the contact with humans (e.g., short-term over a limited period of interaction sessions or long-term),
*  The robot's functionality (e.g., only one clearly defined limited function compared to a multi-functional robot that may learn and adapt),
*  The role of the robot (e.g., whether it is presented to the user and used as a tool or as an assistant, companion with personality traits and emotional expressiveness)
*  The necessity of the robot to be social/communicative (e.g., human-robot verbal dialogue may be useful for certain applications, but not for others where users may have language impairment and where alternative interfaces may be more suitable).

Not only the nature of the assistance needed by a user will influence the robot's degree of social and communicative skills, but also individual user preferences, likes and dislikes are important. For example, a young child with movement impairments might love to have a robotic friend in order to make therapy or rehabilitation more fun. An adult in  a similar medical situation may focus on the functionality of the robot in  terms of benefit to his health, or the cost of using the robot compared to  other devices, and he may not necessarily desire a robotic system that tries to be fun and build a relationship.

For the evaluation and analysis of user-system interaction, methods used in social sciences, human-computer interaction, and psychology are often relevant; however, working with people with special needs poses particular constraints resulting from their vulnerability, and opens up challenges for creative development of new approaches, methods and methodologies for system design, interaction analysis and evaluation. Last but not least, various constraints (cultural,  social-economic,  political etc.) may decide on whether a system, well-designed and  well-liked by its target users, will ultimately be used widely and thus fulfill its promise.

The workshop will provide a state of the art overview and discussion of important topics relevant to Robotic Helpers. This topic is closely related to the overall conference theme of Living with Robots, but the workshop will be oriented specifically towards real world applications in rehabilitation and robot assisted living.

The workshop will take a multi-disciplinary view, which is necessary in order to build foundational knowledge that will help in future to design systems that are able to care for people, and that people care about.

Topics of interest include, but are not restricted to the following list:
*  assistive robotics
*  therapy robotics
*  robot assisted play
*  non-invasive methods of interfacing users
*  interfaces and modalities for user control (e.g. for patients, therapists etc.)
*  sustaining engagement of users
*  personalizing interfaces and interaction
*  adjustable autonomy
*  adaptable and adaptive interfaces
*  user needs and interaction
*  user experience
*  evaluation of interfaces and systems in rehabilitation
*  robots as autonomous companions or tools in rehabilitation
*  ethical issues of using robots in assistive technology and rehabilitation
*  related issues

Dates and Location:

The workshop is associated to HRI'08, 12-15 March 2008, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The workshop will be held on 12 March 2008.

Workshop Organizers:

--Kerstin Dautenhahn, University of Hertfordshire, UK (use K.Dautenhahn "@" herts "." ac "." uk for any inquiries regarding the workshop)
--Gert Jan Gelderblom, VILANS, the Netherlands, (gj.gelderblom "@" irv "dot" nl)
--Holly Yanco, Computer Science Department, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA (holly "@"cs "." uml "."edu)

Submission of Contributions:

We invite the submission of full papers or extended abstracts (PDF, double column, ACM SIG Proceedings format, 2-3 pages for extended abstracts, up to 8 pages for full papers). Submissions may be research papers on original work, system design descriptions, research surveys, project descriptions, or position papers. Note that papers without any explicit discussion or application of the context of assistive or therapy robotics will not be accepted. Please send the PDF submissions to K.Dautenhahn "@" herts "." ac "." uk (files bigger than 2MB will not be accepted). All submissions will be peer reviewed. Final contributions in the same format (PDF, double column,  ACM SIG Proceedings format) and up to 8 pages will be included in the  workshop publication.

Workshop Participation:

The workshop will be limited to 30 participants. Within this constraint anyone interested in the topic is welcome to attend, as long as he/she has registered for the workshop and main conference.

Workshop Publication:

Final versions of papers will be made available online (PDF) on the workshops website.  It is also planned to print the proceedings as a technical report. A book or  special journal issue publication resulting from the workshop will be considered but will depend on the number and quality of submissions.

Important Dates:
*  14 December 2007: Deadline for submission of extended abstracts
*  21 January 2008: Deadline for notifications sent to authors
*  11 February 2008: Deadline for submission of final workshop contributions