Computerised Minds. ...

A video sponsored by the society discusses Searle's Chinese Room Argument (CRA) and the heated debates surrounding it. In this video, which is accessible to the general public and those with interest in AI, Olly's Philosophy Tube ...


Erden in AI roundtab...

On Friday 4th September, philosopher and AISB member Dr Yasemin J Erden, participated in an AI roundtable at Second Home, hosted by Index Ventures and SwiftKey.   Joining her on the panel were colleagues from academia and indu...


AISB Convention 2016

The AISB Convention is an annual conference covering the range of AI and Cognitive Science, organised by the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour. The 2016 Convention will be held at the Uni...


Bishop and AI news

Stephen Hawking thinks computers may surpass human intelligence and take over the world. This view is based on the ideology that all aspects of human mentality will eventually be realised by a program running on a suitable compu...


Connection Science

All individual members of The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour have a personal subscription to the Taylor Francis journal Connection Science as part of their membership. How to Acce...


Al-Rifaie on BBC

AISB Committee member and Research Fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, Dr Mohammad Majid al-Rifaie was interviewed by the BBC (in Farsi) along with his colleague Mohammad Ali Javaheri Javid on the 6 November 2014. He was a...


AISB YouTube Channel

The AISB has launched a YouTube channel: ( The channel currently holds a number of videos from the AISB 2010 Convention. Videos include the AISB round t...



AISB opportunities Bulletin Item

CALL FOR PAPERS: Special issue JLC: 20 years of argument-based inference

Journal of Logic and Computation: special issue

The field of formal argumentation can be traced back to work published in the early nineties, such 
as that of Pollock, Simari and Loui, and Vreeswijk. A major impulse was given by the work of Dung, 
who proved that various formalisms for nonmonotonic entailment could be seen as instances of 
abstract argumentation theory.

The aim of the special issue is to publish high level work on the topic of how the argumentation 
paradigm can be used to define meaningful ways of logical inference. We solicit original work on 
topics including, but not limited to:
- using the argumentation paradigm to simulate other (existing) approaches for nonmonotonic inference
- rationality postulates and how to satisfy them
- defining meaningful instantiations of abstract argumentation approaches
- the handling of defeasible priorities between arguments, in the context of logical inference
- philosophical and/or psychological aspects of argument-based inference
- argument-based inference using a combination of (defeasible) argument schemes and classical logic
- argument-based inference versus other approaches (like paraconsistent logic, classical NMR)

Work that restricts itself to pure abstract argumentation, without relating to the notion of 
logical inference, is considered to be outside the scope of the special issue. Such work will be 
diverted as an ordinary submission to the argumentation corner of the Journal of Logic and 

We encourage submissions of high quality, original papers which are not simultaneously submitted 
for publication elsewhere. Instructions for submitting papers can be found at

Reviewing will take place according to the standards common at JLC.
Authors will be able to keep part of the copyright, so that their work can also be published by 
other means (for instance as book chapters), after the special issue has appeared.

Important dates:
- submissions due for review: 1 October 2011
- notification of 1st decision: 15 January 2012
- revisions due: 1 March 2012
- notification of acceptance: 1 April 2012
- final version due: 1 May 2012
- issue publication: late 2012

Special issue editors:
- Martin Caminada 
- Massimiliano Giacomin